By Tabitha Evans Moore
Editor & Publisher
A press release is not a court order. That distinction matters this week in the ongoing Uncle Nearest legal saga.
On the morning of March 17, Uncle Nearest founder and CEO Fawn Weaver posted a video to social media announcing that the company had filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy, sued Farm Credit Mid-America in a New York court for defamation, and — critically — that the court-ordered receivership overseeing the company had come “to an end.” A press release from Grant Sidney, Inc., Weaver’s private investment firm and Uncle Nearest’s largest shareholder, amplified the same message.
By 8:47 that same evening, the receiver had filed an expedited motion for sanctions.
What the court record shows
Uncle Nearest was placed into court-ordered receivership in August 2025, after Farm Credit Mid-America filed suit in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee alleging the company had defaulted on approximately $108 million in loans and lines of credit. A federal judge appointed receiver Phillip G. Young Jr. to oversee the company and its assets — and vested in him the legal authority to act on behalf of the company’s entities in place of its officers and managers.
A December 22, 2025 ruling further specified that only the receiver could represent the defendant companies’ interests in litigation.
On March 17, Weaver signed Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions for Uncle Nearest Inc., Nearest Green Distillery Inc., and Uncle Nearest Real Estate Holdings LLC. Her attorneys argued the receivership order authorized the receiver to file for bankruptcy without granting him exclusive authority to do so.
Young disagreed, forcefully. In his expedited motion, he called Weaver’s filings a “wanton and willful violation” of the court’s receivership order and asked the court to declare the petitions unauthorized and impose $25,000 in sanctions per filing — a total of $75,000 — against Weaver and potentially her attorneys. Young also stated that Weaver’s public declarations that the receivership had ended created substantial confusion among customers, vendors, distributors, employees, shareholders, and potential asset buyers, triggering dozens of calls and emails within hours with an “immediate and negative impact” on operations and the ongoing asset-sale process.
He added that he has been in contact with the U.S. Bankruptcy Trustee’s office and is working toward dismissal of what he characterized as unauthorized filings — while acknowledging that bankruptcy protection may ultimately be appropriate for the companies, but that the timing and authority questions remain unresolved.
What is and isn’t settled
The receivership has not ended. A press release saying so does not make it so. That determination belongs to a federal judge, and as of this writing, no such ruling has been issued.
The Chapter 11 filings are now the subject of an active dispute between two federal venues — the district court where the receivership is proceeding and the bankruptcy court where Weaver’s petitions were filed. The central question is whether Weaver had the legal authority to sign those petitions at all.
Weaver’s side has also filed a defamation lawsuit against Farm Credit in New York state court, alleging the lender knowingly circulated false claims about the company’s inventory, finances, and solvency. That case is in its earliest stages.
What is true: Chapter 11 petitions were filed. The receiver has moved to have them dismissed. Sanctions have been requested. The receivership order remains in effect unless and until a court says otherwise.
A note on sourcing
When one party in active litigation issues a press release declaring victory — or in this case, declaring a court-ordered process concluded — that is not news. It is a legal maneuver in a press release. Reporting it as established fact, without verification of the underlying court record, is a mistake that serves the party making the claim rather than the public trying to understand what is actually happening.
The Lynchburg Times will continue to cover this case from the court record. •
About the Lynchburg Times: The Lynchburg Times is Moore County’s locally owned, independent news source. Our reporting is supported by readers, small business partners, and underwriters who believe community journalism matters. If this story was valuable to you, consider becoming a supporter at lynchburgtimes.com.