By Tabitha Evans Moore
Editor & Publisher
The court-appointed receiver overseeing Uncle Nearest, Inc. has asked a federal judge for expedited approval to sell a Martha’s Vineyard property for $2.595 million, arguing the asset generates no revenue and carries ongoing expenses that burden the receivership estate.
According to the motion, the property — located at 10 Codman Spring Road in Edgartown, Massachusetts — is under contract at the full asking price, with two backup offers in place. The receiver states that closing is scheduled for March 19 and that delay could jeopardize the sale. Proceeds would first satisfy a roughly $1.5 million primary lien, with remaining funds directed toward secured lender Farm Credit Mid-America, which has consented to the transaction. The Weavers have declined to consent.
The proposed sale comes amid a broader legal effort by the receiver to clarify the scope of the existing receivership. In a supplemental filing, the receiver argues that Uncle Nearest and certain affiliated entities may have operated so closely that they should be treated as a single enterprise for purposes of court supervision. The filing cites numerous intercompany transfers and a $20 million convertible note transaction as part of that argument.
Under the “alter ego” legal theory referenced in the filing, courts may look beyond formal corporate separations when entities share management, ownership, and financial control. If the court accepts that analysis, it could expand the receiver’s authority over related companies and their assets.
Uncle Nearest CEO Fawn Weaver has disputed the receiver’s characterization of recent transactions. In shareholder communications attached as exhibits, she denied personally benefiting from the $20 million transaction and stated that proceeds were used for payroll and vendor payments during negotiations with Farm Credit. She also maintained that documentation supporting those transactions has been provided to the receiver.
At issue now is not the long-term future of the brand, but how broadly the receiver’s authority should extend while litigation between the company and its lender continues. The court is expected to consider the property sale request alongside arguments regarding the structure and oversight of affiliated entities.
If the court approves the sale, proceeds from the Martha’s Vineyard property would be directed toward paying secured debt, slightly reducing the financial pressure surrounding the company while litigation continues. More broadly, if the judge agrees with the receiver’s argument that affiliated entities functioned as a single enterprise, the scope of the receivership could expand to include additional assets. If the court declines that theory, oversight would likely remain limited to the original entities named in the case. In short, the upcoming rulings will help determine how much authority the receiver has — and how aggressively assets may be consolidated or sold — as the legal dispute moves forward. •
About The Lynchburg Times: We’re independent, reader-supported, and proudly homegrown. We hold the history, relationships, and journalistic craft to deliver professional reporting from one of America’s tiniest and most famous towns. Because of that, there are some stories you’ll only read in The Lynchburg Times. Every dollar of reader support stays right here in Moore County, funding local writers, photographers, and storytellers. When you support The Lynchburg Times, you’re not just backing a local newsroom — you’re preserving the art of storytelling in the South. [Join us here.]